Connect Contract Requirements to Scenario Execution
Find the gaps before they find you. Coverage transforms "we think we're testing everything" into "we proved we are."
What You Can Answer
Contract Exercise Matrix
Which scenarios trigger which contracts? Are all contracts exercised across multiple attack families?
Gap Detection
Missing signal sources (is KYC freshness checked in all scenarios?), absent detectors (do all decision points validate device consistency?), insufficient approval routing (are high-impact failures escalated to compliance?), latency mismatches (does batch processing meet SLA?).
Decision-Point Heatmap
Which decision points are well-tested vs. under-tested? Where is testing coverage sparse or absent?
Trending
Quarter-over-quarter coverage growth or regression; new contracts driving test expansion.
Coverage Views
Contract → Scenarios Matrix
Rows = contracts, columns = scenario families, cells show count of scenarios exercising that contract. Identify blank cells (untested contracts).
Decision-Point Heatmap
Onboarding vs. KYC vs. Payout vs. Dispute; color intensity = test scenario count. Spots gaps visually.
Gaps Report
Specific findings ("KYC name-match detector not invoked in 14 synthetic-identity scenarios"; "Supervisor approval gate missing from $50k+ payout decisions").
Practical Outcome
Coverage elevates resilience from qualitative ("we have good controls") to quantitative ("87% of contracts exercised across ≥3 attack families; 2 contracts untested; gap remediation scheduled Q1 2025").