Agentic Workflow Resilience
Validate agentic systems where decisions are distributed across tool invocation, retrieval, policy, and approval.
Modern fraud and AML workflows increasingly delegate decisions to agents: evaluating which tools to invoke, how to interpret retrieval results, when to escalate, and whether to approve. Adversaia™ extends adversarial testing to agentic systems:
Tool Invocation Validation
Do agents correctly invoke KYC verification before onboarding? Do they skip high-risk detectors under time pressure? Are tool permissions enforced (e.g., "dispute approvals require supervisor tool, not self-service tool")?
RAG/Retrieval Steering
Does malicious prompt injection cause agents to retrieve and act on false historical data? Do agents correctly weight freshness and confidence in retrieved records?
Policy Constraint Enforcement
Can agents override approval gates, sidestep velocity limits, or misuse escalation authority? Are policy guardrails correctly constraining action space?
Approval Orchestration
When an agent routes a decision to human approval, does the approval gate execute correctly? Are approvers sufficiently informed (full lineage) to make sound decisions?
Decision Contracts for Agents
Define which tools must be invoked, in what sequence, with what confidence thresholds. Validate contract compliance across adversarial scenarios (agent jailbreaks, prompt injection, resource constraints).
Lineage trails the entire agent execution path: initial request → tool sequence → RAG context → policy evaluation → approval routing → final decision.